{"id":20188,"date":"2015-11-02T18:51:52","date_gmt":"2015-11-02T23:51:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/?p=20188"},"modified":"2021-10-07T12:02:53","modified_gmt":"2021-10-07T16:02:53","slug":"free-to-serve-protecting-the-religious-freedom-of-faith-based-organizations-a-book-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2015\/11\/02\/free-to-serve-protecting-the-religious-freedom-of-faith-based-organizations-a-book-review\/","title":{"rendered":"How To Protect The Religious Freedom of Faith-Based Organizations"},"content":{"rendered":"

Last week I obtained a copy of the book Free To Serve.  <\/em>My review of the book is below.  I highly recommend it for leaders of faith-based organizations and for those in the law and religion academic community.  While this is not an academic book it does outline the problems faced by religious organizations in our secular environment.  As noted below, it centres on the US experience but the issues faced there are similar throughout the Western world.<\/p>\n

Conversation With The Author<\/strong><\/p>\n

It was my pleasure today to speak with one of the authors, Stanley W. Carlson-Thies, about this book and why he and Stephen V. Monsma wrote it.  You may be interested in watching our conversation.  It is divided into three parts:<\/p>\n

Part 1 Stanley W Carlson Thies with Barry W Bussey 15 11 02 <\/a><\/p>\n

Part 2 Stanley W Carlson Thies with Barry W Bussey 15 11 02 <\/a><\/p>\n

Part 3 Stanley W  Carlson Thies with Barry W  Bussey 15 11 02<\/a><\/p>\n

Book Review<\/strong><\/p>\n

Stephen V. Monsma & Stanley W. Carlson-Thies, Free To Serve: Protecting The Religious Freedom of Faith-Based Organizations<\/em> (Grand Rapids: Brazos Press, 2015), 198 pages.  $18.69 Canadian at Amazon<\/a><\/p>\n

The Problem:  Faith-based Organizations Are Denied Religious Freedom<\/strong><\/p>\n

Faith-based organizations’ ability to freely express their religious convictions is threatened more than ever and such threats are on the rise.  However, Monsma and Carlson-Thies assure us that there is hope.1<\/a><\/sup> They optimistically suggest that the American pluralist society has room for all to live together despite \u201cdeep differences.\u201d  Religious and non-religious alike benefit when freedom is protected for all faith-based organizations.  However, religious freedom is challenged when religiously motivated people are denied freedom to allow their faith-based organizations to carry out their faith in the \u201cpublic realms of health care, education, and services to the needy.\u201d2<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

The Solution:  Principled Pluralism<\/strong><\/p>\n

Their vision is for all people to be free to worship, or not, as their beliefs require.  Religious people ought to be able to live out their faith in the nation\u2019s public life through faith-based organizations.  Religious freedom requires at least as much.  There must be a profound respect for the diversity of belief\/non-belief systems, perspectives and organizations where none is favoured over another.  It is a commitment to religious freedom, pluralism and tolerance.3<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

The solution to this quandary is a \u201cprincipled pluralism\u201d that has four principles:  first, all human beings are morally responsible.  They are free individuals who possess human dignity and certain fundamental rights, the most basic of which is freedom of religion;4<\/a><\/sup> second, human beings are social;5<\/a><\/sup> third, government must not prevent its members from being able to create and sustain nongovernmental organizations that are based on and reflect their members\u2019 deeply held beliefs;6<\/a><\/sup> and fourth, as government should not dominate society\u2019s organizations nor should one organization seek to dominate or control other organizations or individuals.7<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

Working out this “principled pluralism” will require a mutual \u201cforbearance and toleration as they experience inconvenience and burdens due to their fellow citizens living as their beliefs require them to live.\u201d8<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

The False Assumptions<\/strong><\/p>\n

The authors reject the notion that religious organizations are said not to be deserving of religious freedom because they operate outside a church.  They point to World Vision\u2019s struggle to maintain its right to fire three employees who no longer supported its statement of faith.  The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled 2-1 in World Vision\u2019s favour.  However, as Monsma and Carlson-Thies point out, it was a close call.9<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

Judge Marsha Berzon\u2019s dissenting decision causes one to pause when she argued that World Vision was \u201cnothing like a church\u201d to be exempt from the requirement not to discriminate against the religious beliefs of its employees.  It\u2019s humanitarian work, she pointed out, \u201con its face, [is] secular.\u201d10<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

Berzon\u2019s view is one that is gaining popularity, not only in the US but throughout Western democracies.  It is a very narrow description of religious freedom based on at least two assumptions.  First, religious activities involve only those that fall within the rubric of church services and religious rites.  Second, it assumes that religious freedom is solely for individuals and their religious communities – it does not include faith-based (profit or not-for-profit) corporations.<\/p>\n

Throughout this volume Monsma and Carlson-Thies addresses these assumptions, and others, that would deny religious freedom to faith-based organizations.  They do so by arguing that the protection of religion includes not only the worship rites but it also includes the manifestation of those beliefs in all areas of life.  In particular, they point out that Christianity (and other religions as well) does not limit itself to weekly church services.  Its religious norms are applicable throughout the week and are operative in all occasions.  It is why Steven McFarland, vice-president and chief legal officer of World Vision could say, \u201cWe are not just another humanitarian organization, but a branch of the body of Christ.\u201d11<\/a><\/sup>  Faith-based organizations operationalize the religious sentiments that are articulated in the churches, synagogues, mosques, etc. in the form of health care, education and other endeavours to help those in need.  When religious people \u201c\u2026band together to create service organizations to fulfill their religious obligations more effectively than they could as individuals or as members of a local congregation, there is no reason why those organizations are any less religious than local congregations.\u201d12<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

The secular\/religious divide is a construct of recent origin.  The American Civil Liberties Union, Political Research Associates and other groups have been advocating this description.  The authors point out that Martin Luther King Jr. \u201cwould have problems calling desegregation a \u2018secular value,\u2019 as would hosts of brave demonstrators who marched out of their churches and into the streets in the 1960s.\u201d13<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

To suggest that government funding transforms a faith-based organization to a government actor is a wrong characterization of the relationship.  Rather, the authors point out that it should be seen as a partnership whereby the government recognizes that it can be more efficient and effective by tapping into the support networks of the \u201cindependent sector\u201d to remedy a common problem.14<\/a><\/sup>  In the same way that a government gift to an arts organization does not mean that organization is now a government actor so a faith-based organization should not lose its identity because it receives government funding.15<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

The authors reject the assumption that Christianity\u2019s cultural dominance and any attempt to protect religious freedom is an attempt to use public policies to maintain a favoured position.16<\/a><\/sup>  The opposite is true.  \u201cChristianity, is anything but culturally dominant\u201d in the U.S. and one might add in much of Western liberal democracies.17<\/a><\/sup>  The reality is that both the religious and the non-religious feel marginalized by the other group which makes it more difficult to establish common ground.18<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

Religious Freedom Also Extends To Faith-based For-Profit Entities<\/strong><\/p>\n

Monsma and Carlson-Thies point out that faith-based organizations are not solely non-profit or charities.  They are also for-profit entities \u2013 such as the Hobby Lobby case illustrates.  Consider for a moment that Hobby Lobby applied its owners’ Christian principles in the workplace by giving employees about double the minimum wage, comprehensive health coverage and one day (Sunday) off each week.  Media reports were not as interested in those provisions as they were about Hobby Lobby\u2019s refusal to provide abortifacient medication to its employees.  The refusal was due to the conscientious objection of Hobby Lobby owners, the Green family of Oklahoma.19<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

While the US Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in favour of granting Hobby Lobby the exemption based on its right to religious freedom, that decision, as Monsma and Carlson-Thies point out, \u201cremains on shaky ground.\u201d20<\/a><\/sup>  The media tried to frame the case as the Green family imposing their religious scruples on its employees.  Such a position is unfair.  That would only be the case, the authors argue, if the Green family fired those employees who were using the abortifacients, or the Green family was lobbying Congress for a law against this form of birth control.  The only coercion in this case came from \u201c\u2026those who were seeking to force the Green family to act contrary to their religious beliefs.\u201d21<\/a><\/sup>  The authors reject the argument that this was a \u201csecular\u201d corporation and therefore not entitled to religious freedom.  The corporate mission statement and faith inspired practises establish that the owners were, in fact, operating it as a religious based entity.  To deny it protection because of its corporate status could also exclude incorporated churches.  In short, \u201c\u2026religion is more than worship\u2026.\u201d22<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

Monsma and Carlson-Thies emphasize two limitations on the religious freedom of for-profit organizations.  One, there must be a \u201cclear, explicit, demonstrable religious commitment.  Two, there is no \u201cgeneral right to avoid legal requirements to which they have religiously based objections.\u201d23<\/a><\/sup>  There has to be a balancing of the competing interests.<\/p>\n

Other Views<\/strong><\/p>\n

This book also contains six essays written from Roman Catholic, evangelical, Jewish, Muslim and non-religious backgrounds.  Their purpose is to make explicit that Monsma and Carlson-Thies\u2019 concerns are shared by a diverse group.  These essays are very helpful.  Tish Harrison Warren\u2019s piece, \u201cThe Wrong Kind of Christian\u201d gave a first-hand account of a Christian organization that was forced off Vanderbilt University\u2019s campus because it required its student leaders to sign a statement of faith.  Warren, an Episcopal priest, said \u201cReligious organizations were welcome as long as they were malleable \u2013 as long as their leaders didn\u2019t need to profess anything in particular; as long as they could be governed by sheer democracy and adjust to popular mores or trends; as long as they didn\u2019t prioritize theological stability.\u201d24<\/a><\/sup> Warren came up against a university bureaucracy that was against \u201cdiscrimination.\u201d  The word “discrimination” was \u201clobbed like a grenade to end all argument.\u201d  One university official stated, \u201cCreedal discrimination is still discrimination.\u201d25<\/a><\/sup>  Creedal belief and sexual expression, notes Warren, were \u201cnot just wrong but evil, narrow-minded, and too dangerous to be tolerated on campus.\u201d26<\/a><\/sup>  There remained a \u201cculture of fear\u201d on campus where sympathetic professors remained silent in their support of the Christian organization for fear that \u201cgoing public would be \u2018career damaging.\u2019\u201d27<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

\u201cWhen religious liberty is not secure, nothing is,\u201d wrote Kristina Arriaga de Bucholz in her short essay included in this volume.28<\/a><\/sup>  Bucholz reviewed the experience of the religious order, Little Sisters of the Poor, who refused to agree to pay for the abortifacient drugs as part of the government\u2019s mandatory healthcare.  Little Sisters provides elderly care for people of all faiths who otherwise would not have such help at the end of life.  Yet the government was willing to shut them down with crippling fines.  Little Sisters is currently pursuing their right to religious freedom in court.<\/p>\n

Kim Colby\u2019s essay asks the question, \u201cWill pluralism survive the death of relativism?\u201d29<\/a><\/sup>  She maintains that relativism was good for religious freedom as, by definition, it had to respect the right of individuals to hold diverse opinions.  However, today there is a \u201cTruth 2.0\u201d that has swept relativism aside and proclaims a new fundamental truth:  \u201can individual\u2019s sexual autonomy must be unhindered, even unquestioned, no matter what the cost to others\u2019 liberty or even to others\u2019 right to life.\u201d  It demands \u201cthat everyone must agree that abortion and sexual conduct outside of traditional marriage are not only acceptable but affirmatively good.\u201d30<\/a><\/sup> And dissent will not be tolerated.<\/p>\n

Nathan Diament, an Orthodox Jew, points out that Jews realize that the religious freedom experienced in the U.S. is unprecedented in history.  Therefore, his question \u201cCan it happen here, in America?\u201d has an ominous tone \u2013 is it possible that such protections could be expunged in America?31<\/a><\/sup>  The Enlightened French experience for Jews was \u201ca Jew in the home, but a Frenchman in the street,\u201d has not been the American experience.  It is antithetical to Judaism which \u201crecognizes no notion of \u2018being a Jew in the home\u2019 and something else in the street or office or classroom or marketplace or park.\u201d32<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

The Muslim perspective, in this book, was given by Hamza Yusuf Hanson and Mahan Hussain Mirza.  \u201cMuslims,\u201d they stated, \u201cstand in solidarity with other faith communities to advocate for the right to live and preach their convictions in the public sphere.\u201d33<\/a><\/sup>  They maintain that the best way to mediate difference is to allow for a plurality of opinions in free and open debate with power of persuasion resting in arguments.  They see successful faith-based institutions in America as a model to bring hope and relief to Muslims everywhere.<\/p>\n

Distinguished law professor Douglas Laycock presents a secular perspective in his essay.  \u201cI do not support religious liberty because religion is good,\u201d admits Laycock, \u201cbut because religion is profoundly important to those who care about it.\u201d34<\/a><\/sup>  He argues that when government \u201cstays out of the way\u201d religion flourishes.  \u201cThe whole point of religious liberty is that people from across the whole range of views about religion agree to respect the religious liberty of everyone else across the whole range of views about religion.\u201d35<\/a><\/sup>  However, government rarely has a compelling interest in preventing people from feeling offended, insulted, or irritated.<\/p>\n

Conclusion:  Practical Steps Going Forward<\/strong><\/p>\n

The authors close their book with five practical steps faith-based organization can take to protect their religious freedom.  First, explicitly stating religious commitments.36<\/a><\/sup>  By holding themselves out as religious in all publications, policies, web presence etc. they increase their credibility as being religious.  It will forewarn potential employees the religious nature of the operation.  Second, avoid even the appearance of coercing others to follow one\u2019s religiously based practises.  There is a distinction between providing services to those engaged in \u201cactivities that are legal but immoral, and providing services that make it complicit in those immoral activities.\u201d37<\/a><\/sup>  There is also a distinction \u201cbetween refusing to provide a service its religious beliefs hold to be immoral and attempting to prevent someone from obtaining that service elsewhere.\u201d38<\/a><\/sup>  By showing respect to a pluralist society the faith-based organization signals its commitment to pluralism and it will strengthen its defense of religious freedom.39<\/a><\/sup>  Third, show respect for and work with others who disagree.40<\/a><\/sup>  Such an attitude demonstrates that they are not simply another advocacy group interested solely in its own protections but cares about the religious freedom of others.  It also opens the door for others to reciprocate the support.  Fourth, get to know community leaders.41<\/a><\/sup>  Ignorance of a group will lead to misconceptions.  Faith-based groups will do best to meet and know community leaders before there is an issue or controversy.  Fifth, work with others to defend everyone\u2019s religious freedom rights.42<\/a><\/sup>  They argue that there is a need to work with umbrella organizations and not stand alone \u2013 \u201cThere is strength in numbers.\u201d43<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

Evaluation:  Timely but the Conversation Must Continue<\/strong><\/p>\n

While the authors are optimistic that a principled pluralism is possible and even desired I am not sure that society, as currently configured, is willing to put forward the requisite effort to make it happen. Our cultural moment appears less inclined for co-operative projects in these areas of concern. We need more discussion about what will be required to accomplish the vision that Monsma and Carlson-Thies outline.<\/p>\n

It seems to me, that further discussions need to be had with those who oppose their views. In many ways this is a book that preaches well to the choir but I question how it may be perceived by those who disagree.  Further conversations must be made with those individuals and groups opposing religious freedom of faith-based organizations.<\/p>\n

Monsma and Carlson-Thies\u2019s Free to Serve<\/em> <\/em>is timely and necessary.  The pressure on faith-based organizations to conform to a secular ideology is intense.  Such conformity would result in the loss of their religious character.  The concept of the \u201cpublic\u201d has proven to be dynamic.  Religious communities have established education, healthcare and other centres to meet societal needs for millennia.  It is not as if they are new to the field.  Such endeavours were long considered \u201cprivate,\u201d that is to say, the religious groups that established the entity maintained their religious character while carrying out their work.  They did so with minimal supervision from government.  If there is anything new, it is the notion of a nation-state seeking to be the sole provider of such services and thereby removing faith-based organizations, or, at the very least, lessening their religious identity to conform to the dominant secular ideology.  Though this book is US centric it addresses issues that are salient throughout the Western World.<\/p>\n

It is a great primer and needs to be read not only by law and religion academics, legal practitioners and those leading faith-based organizations but also by the general public.  Its language is easily accessible.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Notes:<\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

\n
<\/div>\n
    \n
  1. Page viii ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  2. Pages 5-6 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  3. Page 3 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  4. Page 98 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  5. Page 99 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  6. Page 100 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  7. Page 101 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  8. Page 104 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  9.  Silvia Spencer, Vicki Hulse, and Ted Youngberg v. World Vision, US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, August 23, 1010 (No. 08-35532).  Available at http:\/\/cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov\/datastore\/opinions\/2010\/08\/23\/08-35532.pdf ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  10. Page 19 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  11. Page 17 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  12. Page 74 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  13. Page 81 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  14. Page 87 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  15. Pages 87-88 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  16. Page 89 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  17. Page 91 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  18. Page 92 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  19. Pages 52-55 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  20. Page 56 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  21. Page 57 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  22. Page 58 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  23. Page 65 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  24. Page 25 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  25. Page 26 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  26. Page 27 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  27. Page 27 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  28. Page 71 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  29. Page 111 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  30. Page 112 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  31. Page 154 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  32. Page 157 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  33. Page 159 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  34. Page 162 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  35. Page 163 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  36. Page 165 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  37. Page 169 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  38. Page 170 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  39. Page 172 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  40. Page 172 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  41. Page 174 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  42. Page 175 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
  43. Page 176 ↩<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Last week I obtained a copy of the book Free To Serve. My review of the book is below. I highly recommend it for leaders of faith-based organizations and for those in the law and religion academic community. While this is not an academic book it does outline the problems faced by… More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ts_fic_featured_image_caption":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[144],"tags":[286,150,288,138,287,141,142],"series":[],"class_list":["post-20188","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-law-and-religion-2","tag-faith-based-organization","tag-freedom-of-religion","tag-hobby-lobby","tag-law-and-religion","tag-religious-corporation","tag-religious-freedom","tag-religious-liberty"],"yoast_head":"\nHow To Protect The Religious Freedom of Faith-Based Organizations - CCCC Blogs<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2015\/11\/02\/free-to-serve-protecting-the-religious-freedom-of-faith-based-organizations-a-book-review\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"How To Protect The Religious Freedom of Faith-Based Organizations - CCCC Blogs\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Last week I obtained a copy of the book Free To Serve.  My review of the book is below.  I highly recommend it for leaders of faith-based organizations and for those in the law and religion academic community.  While this is not an academic book it does outline the problems faced by... More\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2015\/11\/02\/free-to-serve-protecting-the-religious-freedom-of-faith-based-organizations-a-book-review\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"CCCC Blogs\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CCCCCharities\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-11-02T23:51:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-10-07T16:02:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"cccc\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@cccccharities\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@cccccharities\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"cccc\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/intersection\\\/2015\\\/11\\\/02\\\/free-to-serve-protecting-the-religious-freedom-of-faith-based-organizations-a-book-review\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/intersection\\\/2015\\\/11\\\/02\\\/free-to-serve-protecting-the-religious-freedom-of-faith-based-organizations-a-book-review\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"cccc\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/1462268d674891de61be3d5a4285105c\"},\"headline\":\"How To Protect The Religious Freedom of Faith-Based Organizations\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-11-02T23:51:52+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-10-07T16:02:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/intersection\\\/2015\\\/11\\\/02\\\/free-to-serve-protecting-the-religious-freedom-of-faith-based-organizations-a-book-review\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2965,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"Faith-based Organization\",\"freedom of religion\",\"Hobby Lobby\",\"law and religion\",\"religious corporation\",\"religious freedom\",\"religious liberty\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Law and Religion\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-CA\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/intersection\\\/2015\\\/11\\\/02\\\/free-to-serve-protecting-the-religious-freedom-of-faith-based-organizations-a-book-review\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/intersection\\\/2015\\\/11\\\/02\\\/free-to-serve-protecting-the-religious-freedom-of-faith-based-organizations-a-book-review\\\/\",\"name\":\"How To Protect The Religious Freedom of Faith-Based Organizations - CCCC Blogs\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2015-11-02T23:51:52+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-10-07T16:02:53+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/intersection\\\/2015\\\/11\\\/02\\\/free-to-serve-protecting-the-religious-freedom-of-faith-based-organizations-a-book-review\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-CA\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/intersection\\\/2015\\\/11\\\/02\\\/free-to-serve-protecting-the-religious-freedom-of-faith-based-organizations-a-book-review\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/intersection\\\/2015\\\/11\\\/02\\\/free-to-serve-protecting-the-religious-freedom-of-faith-based-organizations-a-book-review\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"How To Protect The Religious Freedom of Faith-Based Organizations\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/\",\"name\":\"CCCC News & Blogs\",\"description\":\"CCCC Blogs\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-CA\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Canadian Centre for Christian Charities\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/10\\\/260wbRGB.png?fit=260%2C260&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/10\\\/260wbRGB.png?fit=260%2C260&ssl=1\",\"width\":260,\"height\":260,\"caption\":\"Canadian Centre for Christian Charities\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/CCCCCharities\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/cccccharities\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/canadian-council-of-christian-charities\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/1462268d674891de61be3d5a4285105c\",\"name\":\"cccc\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/02b29440f48da4a974e8b529d3dc8c20cb523dd511e5c1fc006363cde92b3025?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/02b29440f48da4a974e8b529d3dc8c20cb523dd511e5c1fc006363cde92b3025?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/02b29440f48da4a974e8b529d3dc8c20cb523dd511e5c1fc006363cde92b3025?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"cccc\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/author\\\/intersection\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"How To Protect The Religious Freedom of Faith-Based Organizations - CCCC Blogs","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2015\/11\/02\/free-to-serve-protecting-the-religious-freedom-of-faith-based-organizations-a-book-review\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"How To Protect The Religious Freedom of Faith-Based Organizations - CCCC Blogs","og_description":"Last week I obtained a copy of the book Free To Serve.  My review of the book is below.  I highly recommend it for leaders of faith-based organizations and for those in the law and religion academic community.  While this is not an academic book it does outline the problems faced by... More","og_url":"https:\/\/cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2015\/11\/02\/free-to-serve-protecting-the-religious-freedom-of-faith-based-organizations-a-book-review\/","og_site_name":"CCCC Blogs","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CCCCCharities","article_published_time":"2015-11-02T23:51:52+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-10-07T16:02:53+00:00","author":"cccc","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@cccccharities","twitter_site":"@cccccharities","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"cccc","Est. reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2015\/11\/02\/free-to-serve-protecting-the-religious-freedom-of-faith-based-organizations-a-book-review\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2015\/11\/02\/free-to-serve-protecting-the-religious-freedom-of-faith-based-organizations-a-book-review\/"},"author":{"name":"cccc","@id":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/#\/schema\/person\/1462268d674891de61be3d5a4285105c"},"headline":"How To Protect The Religious Freedom of Faith-Based Organizations","datePublished":"2015-11-02T23:51:52+00:00","dateModified":"2021-10-07T16:02:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2015\/11\/02\/free-to-serve-protecting-the-religious-freedom-of-faith-based-organizations-a-book-review\/"},"wordCount":2965,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/#organization"},"keywords":["Faith-based Organization","freedom of religion","Hobby Lobby","law and religion","religious corporation","religious freedom","religious liberty"],"articleSection":["Law and Religion"],"inLanguage":"en-CA"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2015\/11\/02\/free-to-serve-protecting-the-religious-freedom-of-faith-based-organizations-a-book-review\/","url":"https:\/\/cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2015\/11\/02\/free-to-serve-protecting-the-religious-freedom-of-faith-based-organizations-a-book-review\/","name":"How To Protect The Religious Freedom of Faith-Based Organizations - CCCC Blogs","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/#website"},"datePublished":"2015-11-02T23:51:52+00:00","dateModified":"2021-10-07T16:02:53+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2015\/11\/02\/free-to-serve-protecting-the-religious-freedom-of-faith-based-organizations-a-book-review\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-CA","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2015\/11\/02\/free-to-serve-protecting-the-religious-freedom-of-faith-based-organizations-a-book-review\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2015\/11\/02\/free-to-serve-protecting-the-religious-freedom-of-faith-based-organizations-a-book-review\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"How To Protect The Religious Freedom of Faith-Based Organizations"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/","name":"CCCC News & Blogs","description":"CCCC Blogs","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-CA"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/#organization","name":"Canadian Centre for Christian Charities","url":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-CA","@id":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/260wbRGB.png?fit=260%2C260&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/260wbRGB.png?fit=260%2C260&ssl=1","width":260,"height":260,"caption":"Canadian Centre for Christian Charities"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CCCCCharities","https:\/\/x.com\/cccccharities","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/canadian-council-of-christian-charities"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/#\/schema\/person\/1462268d674891de61be3d5a4285105c","name":"cccc","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-CA","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/02b29440f48da4a974e8b529d3dc8c20cb523dd511e5c1fc006363cde92b3025?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/02b29440f48da4a974e8b529d3dc8c20cb523dd511e5c1fc006363cde92b3025?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/02b29440f48da4a974e8b529d3dc8c20cb523dd511e5c1fc006363cde92b3025?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"cccc"},"url":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/author\/intersection\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":29244,"url":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2020\/06\/15\/two-years-and-counting\/","url_meta":{"origin":20188,"position":0},"title":"Two Years and Counting","author":"cccc","date":"June 15, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Two years ago, on June 15, 2018, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) handed us their two decisions in the case of Trinity Western University\u2019s (TWU) quest for a law school. At stake was the question of whether or not Canadian diversity had room to allow a private, religious institution\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"religious freedom in Canada\"","block_context":{"text":"religious freedom in Canada","link":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/tag\/religious-freedom-in-canada\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/IMG_7981.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/IMG_7981.jpg?resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/IMG_7981.jpg?resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/IMG_7981.jpg?resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/IMG_7981.jpg?resize=1050%2C600 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/IMG_7981.jpg?resize=1400%2C800 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":28577,"url":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2019\/10\/13\/removal-of-charitable-status\/","url_meta":{"origin":20188,"position":1},"title":"Removal of Charitable Status","author":"cccc","date":"October 13, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"US. Presidential candidate, Beto O'Rourke, is calling for the removal of religious organizations charitable status that does not support same-sex marriage. This is a strange but not unexpected development in the antipathy toward those groups with traditional teachings on marriage and who are pro-life. Unfortunately, there is considerable appetite for\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 3 comments","block_context":{"text":"With 3 comments","link":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2019\/10\/13\/removal-of-charitable-status\/#comments"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/IMG_3313.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/IMG_3313.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/IMG_3313.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/IMG_3313.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/IMG_3313.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/IMG_3313.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":16074,"url":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2013\/11\/22\/only-a-little-pork-in-the-soup-can-religious-beliefs-be-put-on-hold\/","url_meta":{"origin":20188,"position":2},"title":"Only A Little Pork In The Soup: Can Religious Beliefs Be Put On Hold?","author":"cccc","date":"November 22, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"Loyola, a private high School in Montr\u00e9al, is being forced to suppress its Catholic convictions when it teaches the Qu\u00e9bec government\u2019s Ethics and Religious Culture course (\u201cERC\u201d). The Qu\u00e9bec Court of Appeal appeared to suggest that there was no reason for Loyola to be concerned because it has the rest\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Law and Religion"","block_context":{"text":"Law and Religion","link":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/category\/law-and-religion-2\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":14873,"url":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2013\/07\/30\/6-journals-to-keep-current-in-law-and-religion\/","url_meta":{"origin":20188,"position":3},"title":"6 Journals To Keep Current in Law and Religion","author":"cccc","date":"July 30, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"One of the ways to know the latest research in the ever expanding field of law and religion is to keep tabs on the academic journals.\u00a0 Listed below are a few of my favorites.\u00a0 I have highlighted some of the information from their respective websites: International Journal for Religious Freedom:\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"freedom of religion\"","block_context":{"text":"freedom of religion","link":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/tag\/freedom-of-religion\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":28438,"url":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2019\/06\/24\/watch-live-the-future-of-freedom-of-religion\/","url_meta":{"origin":20188,"position":4},"title":"Watch Live: The Future of Freedom of Religion","author":"cccc","date":"June 24, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Barry W. Bussey will be presenting a public lecture at the Faculty of Law, Leiden University, Netherlands on Friday June 28, 2019 starting at 1:00 pm EST. It can be watched live over the internet. There are limited spaces for live streaming. Instructions are given below on how you may\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"freedom of religion\"","block_context":{"text":"freedom of religion","link":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/tag\/freedom-of-religion\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/Future-of-Freedom-of-Religion.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/Future-of-Freedom-of-Religion.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/Future-of-Freedom-of-Religion.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/Future-of-Freedom-of-Religion.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/Future-of-Freedom-of-Religion.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":25500,"url":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2017\/06\/28\/benson-busseys-new-book-on-law-and-religion\/","url_meta":{"origin":20188,"position":5},"title":"Benson & Bussey’s New Book on Law and Religion","author":"cccc","date":"June 28, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 We are pleased to announce the publication of a book on law and religion entitled\u00a0Religion, Liberty and the Jurisdictional Limits of Law, edited by Iain T. Benson and Barry W. Bussey. As the conflicts between law and religion intensify in the Western world more scholars are writing about this\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"law and religion\"","block_context":{"text":"law and religion","link":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/tag\/law-and-religion\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/RLJLL-2017-Cover-200x300.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p30X8p-5fC","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20188","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20188"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20188\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20188"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20188"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20188"},{"taxonomy":"series","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/series?post=20188"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}