{"id":32448,"date":"2021-09-08T10:00:01","date_gmt":"2021-09-08T14:00:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/?p=32448"},"modified":"2022-08-11T16:22:38","modified_gmt":"2022-08-11T20:22:38","slug":"charitable-status-at-issue-in-the-2021-federal-election","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2021\/09\/08\/charitable-status-at-issue-in-the-2021-federal-election\/","title":{"rendered":"Charitable Status at Issue In The 2021 Federal Election"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Barry W. Bussey<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an already divisive election campaign, what is so problematic about a proposal to remove charitable status from pro-life groups? Where did this platform come from, and how should we respond?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When the election was called this summer, few imagined that the registered charitable status of pro-life groups would be on a party\u2019s platform. Now it is a troubling reality. The statement is:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“[Our] \u2026 government will no longer provide charity status to anti-abortion organizations (for example, Crisis Pregnancy Centres) that provide dishonest counseling to women about their rights and about the options available to them at all stages of the pregnancy.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It\u2019s not unusual for some charities to face political pressure or public scrutiny, but, to my knowledge, this is the first time that an election campaign in Canada has pledged to take away registered charitable status from certain groups. Given the recent treatment of pro-life organizations by the government, as evident in the Canada Summer Jobs (CSJ) controversy, this announcement should concern any group \u2013 not just pregnancy care centres \u2013 that might disagree with the government. Historically, charitable status has been based on a recognition of public benefit. This election platform would, instead, make charitable status dependent on political favour. In other words, politics has now moved into charity regulation in a big way.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Unfortunately, I am not surprised by this development. In fact, I am surprised it has taken so long to get to this point. Throughout my career as a lawyer, I have noticed a change in attitude within the legal and political communities towards traditional religious organizations. There is little patience for anyone outside of the mainstream \u2013 particularly religious groups with conservative views on fundamental human life issues such as marriage, birth, and end-of-life. Of course, anti-religious sentiment has been around for a very long time, but in the last two decades we have such disdain pick up momentum.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

The Background: Incremental Steps<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Those of us involved in law and religion have witnessed a steady beat of incremental change in how the government treats the religious expression of the Christian community. Generally, these changes have not caused much of a stir. For example, when the Supreme Court of Canada refused the Hutterites accommodation<\/a> from having their photographs taken for Alberta driver\u2019s licenses in 2009, the broader Christian community did not seem worried about how the decision might affect them. It could be that some were simply unaware of what was happening \u2013 or, if they were aware, they felt powerless to react; many might not have understood the long-term implications of the SCC\u2019s decision. Hindsight, as they say, is always 20\/20.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Hutterite Brethren case marked the beginning of a new, more intense trend against religious practice. The pivotal moment came in 2018 with the Trinity Western University (TWU) decision<\/a>. TWU was denied approval for its law school because its admissions policy required students to not violate its teachings on marriage. The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) called TWU\u2019s policy \u201cdegrading and disrespectful.\u201d However, what was truly disrespectful was the SCC\u2019s mistreatment of TWU\u2019s religious freedom.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The TWU case, more than any other, laid the groundwork for the politicization of charitable status. The Canadian Bar Association, in its representation to the SCC during the TWU case, made it clear that registered charitable status ought to be reviewed in light of \u201cCharter<\/em> values.\u201d (\u201cCharter<\/em> values\u201d is a catchphrase that legal academics and judges use as a guide to determine whether a law or policy is acceptable. The problem is that \u201cCharter <\/em>values\u201d \u2013 unlike Charter <\/em>rights \u2013 are undefined; they tend to be determined by the \u201cidiosyncrasies\u201d or subjective preferences of the judge.) Thus, TWU\u2019s admissions policy was said to be in violation of \u201cCharter <\/em>values\u201d even though TWU was not subject to the Charter <\/em>and had a claim to religious freedom. But, in the mind of the SCC\u2019s majority, this private Christian university could not have a law school because its policies were deemed discriminatory.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Recognizing that registration of religious charities would be targeted as a result of the TWU decision by the SCC, I began editing a book, The Status of Religion and the Public Benefit in Charity Law<\/em><\/a> (Anthem Press, 2020). I warned that, given the political and legal climate, pro-life charities could soon face deregistration. It was my view then (and, unfortunately, it is now coming to fruition) that the government\u2019s handling of the Canada Summer Jobs program was but a harbinger of what was to come. In the CSJ situation, the government required applicants for funding to \u201ccheck the box\u201d stating that they were in favour of the government\u2019s position on abortion and marriage. I noted in the book that \u201cThe CSJ controversy provides an example of how a politically charged public policy issue can quickly and readily transform into a call for removing charitable status of non-conforming religious organizations\u201d (186).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Canada Summer Jobs Program<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The CSJ controversy arose because the government responded to criticism from the Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada (ARCC). ARCC was dismayed that the government had given money<\/a> to groups who were opposed to abortion. ARCC\u2019s Executive Director called upon the government not to allow CSJ funding to go to \u201cgroups that try to remove human rights with bullying and harassment campaigns\u201d (1). \u201cFunding anti-human rights groups does not support communities or teach skills that lead to full-time paid employment with ethical employers,\u201d said ARCC (1). The government responded by putting the attestation requirement on the CSJ application form.[1]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Across the country and across the political spectrum, the attestation was met with severe criticism. Although the government refused to compromise or modify the application form in 2018, in subsequent years they removed the attestation. Unfortunately, the government then proceeded with a systematic \u201creview\u201d of all applications from religious organizations \u2013 including online materials \u2013 to see if there was any evidence of discrimination that would disqualify them from receiving CSJ funding.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In June 2021, the government lost two cases at the Federal Court of Canada[2]<\/a> for their mishandling of CSJ applicants. The Court was so displeased that it ordered the government to pay the legal fees of the charities who challenged the government\u2019s rejection of CSJ funding. The Federal Court was not pleased with how the government handled the CSJ application. In the Redeemer <\/em>case, the Court observed that the government found the university\u2019s teachings on marriage \u201cdiscriminatory\u201d and a letter was sent to Redeemer to provide further information. However, nothing in the letter addressed Redeemer\u2019s teaching on marriage as the cause of concern. The Federal Court said the letter was not \u201ca genuine attempt to seek clarification\u201d but \u201cwas simply going through the motions to appear to be fair, not an exercise in fairness itself\u201d (at para 40).  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Federal Court did not deal with the Charter <\/em>issue since it ruled against the government on the procedural issue. However, it made it clear that “Should it be established in another case that officials discriminated in administering funding programs against faith-based institutions because of the sincerely held religious beliefs of their community, a finding of a Charter<\/em> violation may well result. Such institutions must be treated not just with procedural fairness but also with respect for their Charter<\/em>-protected rights” (at para 47).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The government\u2019s most recent proposal to exclude pro-life groups from having charitable status is, in my view, a continuation of the Canada Summer Jobs debacle. Pro-life groups are facing political pressure, including calls from ARCC<\/a> to remove registered charitable status from \u2018anti-abortion agencies.\u2019 However, such groups do have Charter<\/em> rights. If it can be shown that the government discriminated against pro-life groups because of a political or partisan ideology, a strong argument will be made that such discrimination is unconstitutional.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

What the Proposal Could Mean for CCCC members<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the meantime, members of CCCC should be concerned. Stripping pregnancy care centres of registered charitable status would make it much more difficult for those centres to continue providing much-needed support to vulnerable women. But the implications reach even further. The political platform is ambiguous; it mentions \u201ccrisis pregnancy centres\u201d as an example, but it refers more broadly to \u201canti-abortion organizations\u201d who provide \u201cdishonest counselling.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There are no clear definitions. Would this capture churches? Is a pro-life sermon or Sunday school lesson \u201cdishonest\u201d? What are the \u201crights\u201d and \u201coptions\u201d mentioned in the proposal? Contrary to the government\u2019s assertions, there is no \u201cright\u201d to abortion in the Constitution. What about organizations that hold religious views about the beginnings of life \u2013 are they now subject to being deregistered? It would appear that many charities could be affected by this platform if it becomes reality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What You Can Do<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Given this dramatic proposal for change in policy to politicize the charitable registration process, it is appropriate that Christian charities become more engaged in finding out where all the political parties and candidates stand on these issues. The CRA guidance on public policy activities<\/a> allows charities to engage in matters of public policy so long as it furthers your charitable purpose and you do not engage in partisan politics. This means that you cannot promote one party or candidate over another, but you can reach out to your donors, volunteers, and clients to encourage them to become informed on the issues and to share their stories of the positive impact your ministry has had on their lives. CCCC has published guidance on Public Policy Dialogue and Development Activities (PPDDAS) for its members in the Knowledge Base found here<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

All political parties, candidates, and indeed the entire Canadian population, should be aware of the great work our charities do for the common good of Canada. We need to let them know. We need to encourage them to see through the political fog to keep our charities registered.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

You may want to order your copy of The Status of Religion and the Public Benefit in Charity Law<\/a><\/em> and get in-depth knowledge of why your charity remains a public benefit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Further, you may find my chapter from this book helpful, as I offer an in-depth analysis predicting that this day would come sooner or later. Download a copy here<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Finally, we need to join together in praying for our country and our leadership during this difficult time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

[1]<\/a> For a full review see Barry W. Bussey, \u201cThe Canada Summer Jobs Debate and the Democratic Decline\u201d (2019) 91 Supreme Court Law Review (2d), pp. 245-296. Available at SSRN: https:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3401591<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[2]<\/a> Redeemer University College v. Canada (Employment, Workforce Development and Labour), 2021 FC 686 (CanLII), <https:\/\/canlii.ca\/t\/jgpzv>, BCM International Canada Inc. v. Canada (Employment, Workforce Development and Labour), 2021 FC 687 (CanLII), <https:\/\/canlii.ca\/t\/jgpzw><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Barry W. Bussey In an already divisive election campaign, what is so problematic about a proposal to remove charitable status from pro-life groups? Where did this platform come from, and how should we respond? When the election was called this summer, few imagined that the registered charitable status of pro-life… More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":32462,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ts_fic_featured_image_caption":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[137],"tags":[],"series":[],"class_list":["post-32448","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\nCharitable Status at Issue In The 2021 Federal Election - CCCC Blogs<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2021\/09\/08\/charitable-status-at-issue-in-the-2021-federal-election\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Charitable Status at Issue In The 2021 Federal Election\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In an already divisive election campaign, what is so problematic about a proposal to remove charitable status from pro-life groups? Where did this platform come from, and how should we respond?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2021\/09\/08\/charitable-status-at-issue-in-the-2021-federal-election\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"CCCC Blogs\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CCCCCharities\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-09-08T14:00:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-08-11T20:22:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/election-vote.png?fit=300%2C300&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"300\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"300\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"cccc\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Charitable Status at Issue In The 2021 Federal Election\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"In an already divisive election campaign, what is so problematic about a proposal to remove charitable status from pro-life groups? Where did this platform come from, and how should we respond?\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/election-vote.png?fit=300%2C300&ssl=1\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@cccccharities\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@cccccharities\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"cccc\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/intersection\\\/2021\\\/09\\\/08\\\/charitable-status-at-issue-in-the-2021-federal-election\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/intersection\\\/2021\\\/09\\\/08\\\/charitable-status-at-issue-in-the-2021-federal-election\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"cccc\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/1462268d674891de61be3d5a4285105c\"},\"headline\":\"Charitable Status at Issue In The 2021 Federal Election\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-09-08T14:00:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-08-11T20:22:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/intersection\\\/2021\\\/09\\\/08\\\/charitable-status-at-issue-in-the-2021-federal-election\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1790,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/intersection\\\/2021\\\/09\\\/08\\\/charitable-status-at-issue-in-the-2021-federal-election\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/09\\\/election-vote.png?fit=300%2C300&ssl=1\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-CA\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/intersection\\\/2021\\\/09\\\/08\\\/charitable-status-at-issue-in-the-2021-federal-election\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/intersection\\\/2021\\\/09\\\/08\\\/charitable-status-at-issue-in-the-2021-federal-election\\\/\",\"name\":\"Charitable Status at Issue In The 2021 Federal Election - CCCC Blogs\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/intersection\\\/2021\\\/09\\\/08\\\/charitable-status-at-issue-in-the-2021-federal-election\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/intersection\\\/2021\\\/09\\\/08\\\/charitable-status-at-issue-in-the-2021-federal-election\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/09\\\/election-vote.png?fit=300%2C300&ssl=1\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-09-08T14:00:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-08-11T20:22:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/intersection\\\/2021\\\/09\\\/08\\\/charitable-status-at-issue-in-the-2021-federal-election\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-CA\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/intersection\\\/2021\\\/09\\\/08\\\/charitable-status-at-issue-in-the-2021-federal-election\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/intersection\\\/2021\\\/09\\\/08\\\/charitable-status-at-issue-in-the-2021-federal-election\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/09\\\/election-vote.png?fit=300%2C300&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/09\\\/election-vote.png?fit=300%2C300&ssl=1\",\"width\":300,\"height\":300},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/intersection\\\/2021\\\/09\\\/08\\\/charitable-status-at-issue-in-the-2021-federal-election\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Charitable Status at Issue In The 2021 Federal Election\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/\",\"name\":\"CCCC News & Blogs\",\"description\":\"CCCC Blogs\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-CA\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Canadian Centre for Christian Charities\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/10\\\/260wbRGB.png?fit=260%2C260&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/10\\\/260wbRGB.png?fit=260%2C260&ssl=1\",\"width\":260,\"height\":260,\"caption\":\"Canadian Centre for Christian Charities\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/CCCCCharities\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/cccccharities\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/canadian-council-of-christian-charities\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/1462268d674891de61be3d5a4285105c\",\"name\":\"cccc\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/02b29440f48da4a974e8b529d3dc8c20cb523dd511e5c1fc006363cde92b3025?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/02b29440f48da4a974e8b529d3dc8c20cb523dd511e5c1fc006363cde92b3025?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/02b29440f48da4a974e8b529d3dc8c20cb523dd511e5c1fc006363cde92b3025?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"cccc\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.cccc.org\\\/news_blogs\\\/author\\\/intersection\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Charitable Status at Issue In The 2021 Federal Election - CCCC Blogs","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2021\/09\/08\/charitable-status-at-issue-in-the-2021-federal-election\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Charitable Status at Issue In The 2021 Federal Election","og_description":"In an already divisive election campaign, what is so problematic about a proposal to remove charitable status from pro-life groups? Where did this platform come from, and how should we respond?","og_url":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2021\/09\/08\/charitable-status-at-issue-in-the-2021-federal-election\/","og_site_name":"CCCC Blogs","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CCCCCharities","article_published_time":"2021-09-08T14:00:01+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-08-11T20:22:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":300,"height":300,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/election-vote.png?fit=300%2C300&ssl=1","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"cccc","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Charitable Status at Issue In The 2021 Federal Election","twitter_description":"In an already divisive election campaign, what is so problematic about a proposal to remove charitable status from pro-life groups? Where did this platform come from, and how should we respond?","twitter_image":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/election-vote.png?fit=300%2C300&ssl=1","twitter_creator":"@cccccharities","twitter_site":"@cccccharities","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"cccc","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2021\/09\/08\/charitable-status-at-issue-in-the-2021-federal-election\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2021\/09\/08\/charitable-status-at-issue-in-the-2021-federal-election\/"},"author":{"name":"cccc","@id":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/#\/schema\/person\/1462268d674891de61be3d5a4285105c"},"headline":"Charitable Status at Issue In The 2021 Federal Election","datePublished":"2021-09-08T14:00:01+00:00","dateModified":"2022-08-11T20:22:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2021\/09\/08\/charitable-status-at-issue-in-the-2021-federal-election\/"},"wordCount":1790,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2021\/09\/08\/charitable-status-at-issue-in-the-2021-federal-election\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/election-vote.png?fit=300%2C300&ssl=1","inLanguage":"en-CA"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2021\/09\/08\/charitable-status-at-issue-in-the-2021-federal-election\/","url":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2021\/09\/08\/charitable-status-at-issue-in-the-2021-federal-election\/","name":"Charitable Status at Issue In The 2021 Federal Election - CCCC Blogs","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2021\/09\/08\/charitable-status-at-issue-in-the-2021-federal-election\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2021\/09\/08\/charitable-status-at-issue-in-the-2021-federal-election\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/election-vote.png?fit=300%2C300&ssl=1","datePublished":"2021-09-08T14:00:01+00:00","dateModified":"2022-08-11T20:22:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2021\/09\/08\/charitable-status-at-issue-in-the-2021-federal-election\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-CA","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2021\/09\/08\/charitable-status-at-issue-in-the-2021-federal-election\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-CA","@id":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2021\/09\/08\/charitable-status-at-issue-in-the-2021-federal-election\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/election-vote.png?fit=300%2C300&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/election-vote.png?fit=300%2C300&ssl=1","width":300,"height":300},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/intersection\/2021\/09\/08\/charitable-status-at-issue-in-the-2021-federal-election\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Charitable Status at Issue In The 2021 Federal Election"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/","name":"CCCC News & Blogs","description":"CCCC Blogs","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-CA"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/#organization","name":"Canadian Centre for Christian Charities","url":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-CA","@id":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/260wbRGB.png?fit=260%2C260&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/260wbRGB.png?fit=260%2C260&ssl=1","width":260,"height":260,"caption":"Canadian Centre for Christian Charities"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CCCCCharities","https:\/\/x.com\/cccccharities","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/canadian-council-of-christian-charities"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/#\/schema\/person\/1462268d674891de61be3d5a4285105c","name":"cccc","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-CA","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/02b29440f48da4a974e8b529d3dc8c20cb523dd511e5c1fc006363cde92b3025?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/02b29440f48da4a974e8b529d3dc8c20cb523dd511e5c1fc006363cde92b3025?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/02b29440f48da4a974e8b529d3dc8c20cb523dd511e5c1fc006363cde92b3025?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"cccc"},"url":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/author\/intersection\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/election-vote.png?fit=300%2C300&ssl=1","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":32455,"url":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/cccc\/2021\/09\/08\/charitable-status-for-pregnancy-care-centres-at-risk\/","url_meta":{"origin":32448,"position":0},"title":"Charitable Status for Pregnancy Care Centres at Risk","author":"CCCC","date":"September 8, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Canadian Centre for Christian Charities anticipates legal action on charitable registration. The Canadian Centre for Christian Charities (CCCC) expresses disappointment in a campaign platform that mischaracterizes the work of Canada\u2019s pregnancy care centres as \u201cdishonest\u201d and that targets them for the removal of charitable status. CCCC takes no position and\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/1-2.png?fit=300%2C300&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":33344,"url":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/legal\/2021\/11\/29\/cccc-asks-for-clarity-on-charitable-status\/","url_meta":{"origin":32448,"position":1},"title":"CCCC Asks for Clarity on Charitable Status","author":"Deina Warren","date":"November 29, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"CCCC has written to the federal government about its recent pledge to remove charitable status for \u201canti-abortion organizations (for example, Crisis Pregnancy Centres) that provide dishonest counselling to women about their rights and about the options available to them at all stages of pregnancy.\u201d CCCC expresses deep concern over the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Charity law and policy"","block_context":{"text":"Charity law and policy","link":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/category\/charity-law-and-policy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/blog-image-pregnancycentre.png?fit=600%2C600&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/blog-image-pregnancycentre.png?fit=600%2C600&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/blog-image-pregnancycentre.png?fit=600%2C600&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":38476,"url":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/legal\/2025\/04\/15\/staying-informed-about-charitable-status\/","url_meta":{"origin":32448,"position":2},"title":"Staying Informed about Charitable Status","author":"Deina Warren","date":"April 15, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"As charities advancing religion, we know intuitively the value and importance of these organizations to Canadian society. But a report from a former House of Commons Finance Committee shows that not everyone understands or acknowledges the significant place of religious charities in Canada. The Issue We\u2019ve detailed the report and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Advocacy\"","block_context":{"text":"Advocacy","link":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/tag\/advocacy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/image-3.png?fit=512%2C429&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":33861,"url":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/legal\/2021\/12\/22\/mandate-letters-and-charitable-status\/","url_meta":{"origin":32448,"position":3},"title":"Mandate Letters and Charitable Status","author":"Deina Warren","date":"December 22, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Mandate letters issued by the Prime Minister again raise concerns about charitable status. On December 16, 2021 the Prime Minister issued mandate letters to all cabinet ministers. These are intended to set out the objectives for each minister. Two letters are concerning because they instruct Ministers to introduce or support\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Charity law and policy"","block_context":{"text":"Charity law and policy","link":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/category\/charity-law-and-policy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/Canada-income-tax-Refund.jpg?fit=600%2C600&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/Canada-income-tax-Refund.jpg?fit=600%2C600&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/Canada-income-tax-Refund.jpg?fit=600%2C600&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":35710,"url":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/cccc\/2022\/09\/23\/panel-discussion-politicizing-charitable-status\/","url_meta":{"origin":32448,"position":4},"title":"Panel Discussion: Politicizing Charitable Status","author":"CCCC","date":"September 23, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Regular CCCC blog readers will know that we\u2019ve been actively addressing concerns surrounding charitable status and how recent proposals would negatively impact the entire charitable sector. We aren\u2019t alone in our concern. Diverse charity representatives are also concerned about the destabilizing and detrimental impact of politicizing charitable status. To this\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"charitable status\"","block_context":{"text":"charitable status","link":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/tag\/charitable-status\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/nikohoshi-3qZR6AQx_8w-unsplash-scaled.jpg?fit=1200%2C776&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/nikohoshi-3qZR6AQx_8w-unsplash-scaled.jpg?fit=1200%2C776&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/nikohoshi-3qZR6AQx_8w-unsplash-scaled.jpg?fit=1200%2C776&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/nikohoshi-3qZR6AQx_8w-unsplash-scaled.jpg?fit=1200%2C776&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/nikohoshi-3qZR6AQx_8w-unsplash-scaled.jpg?fit=1200%2C776&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":38013,"url":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/legal\/2024\/11\/05\/politicizing-charitable-status-is-a-problem-for-everyone\/","url_meta":{"origin":32448,"position":5},"title":"Politicizing Charitable Status is a Problem for Everyone","author":"Deina Warren","date":"November 5, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"When charities are used as pawns in political games, everyone loses. On October 29, the government announced proposed changes to the Income Tax Act (ITA) for \u201canti-choice organizations\u201d that are \u201cconcealing the true nature of their services.\u201d The government alleges that these organizations \u201care restricting the rights of vulnerable pregnant\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"charitable status\"","block_context":{"text":"charitable status","link":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/tag\/charitable-status\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Destabilizing-the-sector.png?fit=1200%2C798&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Destabilizing-the-sector.png?fit=1200%2C798&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Destabilizing-the-sector.png?fit=1200%2C798&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Destabilizing-the-sector.png?fit=1200%2C798&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Destabilizing-the-sector.png?fit=1200%2C798&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p30X8p-8rm","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32448","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32448"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32448\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/32462"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32448"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32448"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32448"},{"taxonomy":"series","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cccc.org\/news_blogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/series?post=32448"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}