<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:series="https://publishpress.com/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CCCC BlogsBussey - National Post Op-Ed: Courts have no business reviewing religious decisions - CCCC Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.cccc.org/news_blogs/intersection/2017/11/09/bussey-gets-op-ed-published-in-the-national-post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://cccc.org/news_blogs/intersection/2017/11/09/bussey-gets-op-ed-published-in-the-national-post/</link>
	<description>CCCC Blogs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 16:28:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-CA</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">44556325</site>	<item>
		<title>Bussey &#8211; National Post Op-Ed:  Courts have no business reviewing religious decisions</title>
		<link>https://www.cccc.org/news_blogs/intersection/2017/11/09/bussey-gets-op-ed-published-in-the-national-post/</link>
		<comments>https://www.cccc.org/news_blogs/intersection/2017/11/09/bussey-gets-op-ed-published-in-the-national-post/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 14:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cccc]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law and religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jehovah's Witnesses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.cccc.org/news_blogs/?p=26594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This entry is part 5 of 8 in the series Wall v. JWs Wall v. JWs Alberta Court of Appeal Steps into the Quagmire of Religious Disputes Supreme Court of Canada Decides to Hear The Wall Case: Is A Church Member Entitled To Sue A Congregation Because He Was Disfellowshipped?... <a href="https://www.cccc.org/news_blogs/intersection/2017/11/09/bussey-gets-op-ed-published-in-the-national-post/" class="linkbutton">More</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.cccc.org/news_blogs/intersection/2017/11/09/bussey-gets-op-ed-published-in-the-national-post/">Bussey &#8211; National Post Op-Ed:  Courts have no business reviewing religious decisions</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.cccc.org/news_blogs">CCCC Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="pps-series-post-details pps-series-post-details-variant-classic pps-series-post-details-38706" data-series-id="347"><div class="pps-series-meta-content"><div class="pps-series-meta-text">This entry is part 5 of 8 in the series <a href="https://www.cccc.org/news_blogs/series/wall-v-jws/">Wall v. JWs</a></div></div></div><div class="seriesbox">
<div class="center"><a href="https://www.cccc.org/news_blogs/series/wall-v-jws/" class="series-347" title="Wall v. JWs">Wall v. JWs</a></div>
<ul class="serieslist-ul">
<li class="serieslist-li"><a href="https://www.cccc.org/news_blogs/intersection/2016/09/19/alberta-court-of-appeal-steps-into-the-quagmire-of-religious-disputes/" title="Alberta Court of Appeal Steps into the Quagmire of Religious Disputes">Alberta Court of Appeal Steps into the Quagmire of Religious Disputes</a></li>
<li class="serieslist-li"><a href="https://www.cccc.org/news_blogs/intersection/2017/04/13/supreme-court-of-canada-decides-to-hear-the-wall-case-is-a-church-member-entitled-to-sue-a-congregation-because-he-was-disfellowshipped/" title="Supreme Court of Canada Decides to Hear The Wall Case:  Is A Church Member Entitled To Sue A Congregation Because He Was Disfellowshipped?">Supreme Court of Canada Decides to Hear The Wall Case:  Is A Church Member Entitled To Sue A Congregation Because He Was Disfellowshipped?</a></li>
<li class="serieslist-li"><a href="https://www.cccc.org/news_blogs/intersection/2017/08/25/canadian-council-of-christian-charities-granted-intervener-status-in-wall-case/" title="Canadian Council of Christian Charities Granted Intervener Status in Wall Case">Canadian Council of Christian Charities Granted Intervener Status in Wall Case</a></li>
<li class="serieslist-li"><a href="https://www.cccc.org/news_blogs/intersection/2017/11/06/cccc-makes-oral-argument-at-wall-case/" title="CCCC Makes Oral Argument At Wall Case">CCCC Makes Oral Argument At Wall Case</a></li>
<li class="serieslist-li-current">Bussey &#8211; National Post Op-Ed:  Courts have no business reviewing religious decisions</li>
<li class="serieslist-li"><a href="https://www.cccc.org/news_blogs/intersection/2017/11/16/bridge-city-news-interviews-bussey-on-the-wall-case/" title="Bridge City News Interviews Bussey on the Wall Case">Bridge City News Interviews Bussey on the Wall Case</a></li>
<li class="serieslist-li"><a href="https://www.cccc.org/news_blogs/intersection/2018/05/31/supreme-court-of-canada-decides-jehovahs-witnesses-v-wall/" title="Supreme Court of Canada:  Churches Free to Determine Membership Requirements and Disciplinary Process Without Judicial Review">Supreme Court of Canada:  Churches Free to Determine Membership Requirements and Disciplinary Process Without Judicial Review</a></li>
<li class="serieslist-li"><a href="https://www.cccc.org/news_blogs/intersection/2018/06/01/busseys-commentary-on-wall-decision-recognizing-the-freedom-of-religious-communities-to-make-decisions-on-membership-internal-rules/" title="Bussey&#8217;s Commentary on Wall Decision Recognizing The Freedom of Religious Communities To Make Decisions on Membership &#038; Internal Rules">Bussey&#8217;s Commentary on Wall Decision Recognizing The Freedom of Religious Communities To Make Decisions on Membership &#038; Internal Rules</a></li>
</ul>
<div class="clear"></div>
</div>
<div class="clear-me"></div>
<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-26600" src="https://www.cccc.org/news_blogs/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Nat-Post-300x169.png" alt="" width="300" height="169" srcset="https://www.cccc.org/news_blogs/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Nat-Post-300x169.png 300w, https://www.cccc.org/news_blogs/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Nat-Post-768x432.png 768w, https://www.cccc.org/news_blogs/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Nat-Post-1024x577.png 1024w, https://www.cccc.org/news_blogs/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Nat-Post.png 1190w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></p>
<p>On November 2, the Supreme Court of Canada was asked to do something Canadian courts never do: review the solely religious decision of a church community. Until now, the courts have recoiled from getting involved in religious disputes—and for good reason.</p>
<p><a href="http://nationalpost.com/opinion/courts-have-no-business-reviewing-religious-decisions">Read more here.</a></p>
<div class="pps-navigation-content pps-post-navigation-38766" data-series-id="347"><h3 class="pps-nav-series-title">Wall v. JWs</h3> <span class="pps-nav-links"><span class="pps-nav-left-group"><a href="https://www.cccc.org/news_blogs/intersection/2017/11/06/cccc-makes-oral-argument-at-wall-case/" title="&lt;&lt; CCCC Makes Oral Argument At Wall Case" class="pps-nav-link pps-nav-previous"><svg class="pps-nav-arrow" width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><line x1="19" y1="12" x2="5" y2="12"></line><polyline points="12 19 5 12 12 5"></polyline></svg><span class="pps-nav-link-text">CCCC Makes Oral Argument At Wall Case</span></a></span> <a href="https://www.cccc.org/news_blogs/intersection/2017/11/16/bridge-city-news-interviews-bussey-on-the-wall-case/" title="Bridge City News Interviews Bussey on the Wall Case &gt;&gt;" class="pps-nav-link pps-nav-next"><span class="pps-nav-link-text">Bridge City News Interviews Bussey on the Wall Case</span><svg class="pps-nav-arrow" width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><line x1="5" y1="12" x2="19" y2="12"></line><polyline points="12 5 19 12 12 19"></polyline></svg></a></span></div>
<div id='jp-relatedposts' class='jp-relatedposts' >
	<h3 class="jp-relatedposts-headline"><em>Related</em></h3>
</div><p>The post <a href="https://www.cccc.org/news_blogs/intersection/2017/11/09/bussey-gets-op-ed-published-in-the-national-post/">Bussey &#8211; National Post Op-Ed:  Courts have no business reviewing religious decisions</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.cccc.org/news_blogs">CCCC Blogs</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.cccc.org/news_blogs/intersection/2017/11/09/bussey-gets-op-ed-published-in-the-national-post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<series:name><![CDATA[Wall v. JWs]]></series:name>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">26594</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
