On November 2, the Supreme Court of Canada was asked to do something Canadian courts never do: review the solely religious decision of a church community. Until now, the courts have recoiled from getting involved in religious disputes—and for good reason.
Sign up for Intersection today!
Stay up to date on our recent news articles and updates!
More from Barry
- Charitable Status at Issue In The 2021 Federal Election (Sep. 8, 2021)
- Intersections Interview: CSJ Case (Jul. 30, 2021)
- Why Supreme Court got it right in extending the wall (Jun. 16, 2021)
- That ‘Moral Squint’ and Canada Summer Jobs (Jun. 14, 2021)
- Religious conscience and tall poppy syndrome (Feb. 25, 2021)
- Aga Case(1)
- Canada Summer Jobs(24)
- Conversion Therapy(3)
- CRA Guidance on Religion(1)
- Is Religion Special?(2)
- Ontario Human Rights Commission Review On Creed(1)
- Ontario Law Society and Statement of Principles(1)
- Resources on Law and Religion(3)
- Section 176(2)
- Trinity Western University(42)
- Wall v. JWs(8)
- What's Been Happening(1)
- Alberta Court of Appeal Steps into the Quagmire of Religious Disputes
- Supreme Court of Canada Decides to Hear The Wall Case: Is A Church Member Entitled To Sue A Congregation Because He Was Disfellowshipped?
- Canadian Council of Christian Charities Granted Intervener Status in Wall Case
- CCCC Makes Oral Argument At Wall Case
- Bussey – National Post Op-Ed: Courts have no business reviewing religious decisions
- Bridge City News Interviews Bussey on the Wall Case
- Supreme Court of Canada: Churches Free to Determine Membership Requirements and Disciplinary Process Without Judicial Review
- Bussey’s Commentary on Wall Decision Recognizing The Freedom of Religious Communities To Make Decisions on Membership & Internal Rules